HC-MON-01 / A CONCEPT Monitor readiness & escalation DRAFT — educator and biomedical review required HCM-T01 / HC-CFG-01-A-CONCEPT Rehearse component identity, a mismatch decision and a clear next owner on the fictional HCM-T01 trainer. 01. Confirm the training boundary [BODY] Confirm this is a designated inert or digital training exercise with an educator. Use no patient or live clinical equipment. Evidence: Training scope confirmed. STOP: Stop if training status is unclear. 02. Read the configuration and source [BODY] Match HCM-T01, HC-CFG-01-A-CONCEPT and this A CONCEPT draft. Identify the procedure owner and any approved replacement source. Evidence: Asset, configuration, source revision and reviewer named. STOP: Hold if the exact source is missing or conflicts. 03. Identify the station [BODY] Compare the housing, blank display, fixed handle and support with the concept reference. This is an identity exercise, not proof of real device equivalence. Evidence: The intended trainer is identified. STOP: Do not substitute an unfamiliar real monitor. 04. Locate the left port [P1] Select P1 in the model. Keep its left-side location and external axis consistent with the reference. Evidence: P1 correctly named in the concept. STOP: A plausible visual fit is insufficient evidence. 05. Compare accessory identities [C-A] Distinguish round C-A from rectangular C-B. Use the source identity/compatibility record when supplied; never infer compatibility from color. Evidence: Expected and observed accessory identities recorded. STOP: No approved source record: do not infer compatibility. 06. Review the matched branch [C-A] The intended C-A branch teaches external alignment and axial movement on an approved inert/digital trainer. A reviewer must first approve the exact fit and motion reference. Evidence: Approved reference identified, or motion marked pending. STOP: Until approved, inspect the model without attempting seating. 07. Reset to the challenge [C-B] Present the C-B scenario separately. Keep the lead clear of P1; no connector or port geometry changes between branches. Evidence: C-B remains separate and visible. STOP: Do not insert, force or morph C-B to fit. 08. Choose the hold [C-B] The meaningful wrong choice is Continue with C-B. The correct concept response is HOLD and explain the identity/key discrepancy. Evidence: Reason for HOLD stated in the learner’s own words. STOP: A lesson must block forced successful seating. 09. Record the unresolved evidence [NOTE] Keep expected C-A, observed C-B, source revision and the missing compatibility evidence in an equipment-only note. Evidence: Synthetic discrepancy and HELD state recorded. STOP: Do not invent an instrument reading or validation result. 10. Name the next owner [TAG-H] Identify the educator or designated review role responsible for the next decision. Keep the equipment restriction attached to that ownership. Evidence: Reviewer role and next action are explicit. STOP: Unknown owner leaves the handover incomplete. 11. Close the communication loop [NOTE] The receiver repeats the asset, HELD restriction and next owner. The sender confirms the repeat-back. Evidence: Equipment-only acknowledgement captured in the rehearsal. STOP: Do not include patient or private staff information. 12. Review the learning separately [TAG-H] Review the attempt against educator criteria and propose any content clarification for human approval. The physical training item remains held until its authorized owner resolves the evidence. Evidence: Lesson review and equipment status remain separate. STOP: Passing the exercise never releases clinical equipment. Source basis: Existing HCM-T01 scenario and continuity bible; no approved operating SOP supplied. A completed rehearsal never releases equipment for clinical use.